| |
he
following is a more indepth description of this book by Rudi Prusok, Editor
Emeritus, The Single Shot Rifle Journal. It was used as the Preface
for the Ballard book.
Dutcher’s book is nearly equivalent to the in-depth material
of a doctoral dissertation, but blessedly lacks the lengthy and boring
sections, such as previous research, investigative rationale, and theories
of historical research. Unfortunately, there are no universities that offer
Ph.D.’s in Ballard rifles, or grants to support endeavors in arms research
(unless that research somehow impacts society). But Dutcher has done his
homework. He’s read everything there is to know about Ballard rifles, incorporated
it into his text, and given credit for the sources in a bibliography that
allows you to ascertain his veracity or continue your own research in specific
fields of endeavor. The study has consumed some twenty years of his time,
and untold thousands of dollars in professional photographs of the rifles.
He poses questions about aspects yet unresearched and offers directions
toward answers. Definitive works such as this have time limits in the present
but are open-ended in the future, when new material is discovered. That’s
the nature of research and dissertations.
He uses anecdotes
and historical quotes as illustrations in his chapters so that they form
a text that you’ll want to continue reading as you learn about the evolution
of the Ballard rifle. And Dutcher doesn’t write in fall-asleep academic
prose, but rather in the conversational tone of someone who’s talking to
you and me about something that interests us. And it’s a complicated subject,
embroiled in the arms machinations of the Civil War with the participants’
feverish quest to adopt a more usable arm. The Ballard was one of the main
contenders for a rifle for the Union cause, but it was beset with production
problems. In this book, you learn why that was.
The Ballard went
through several manufacturers’ attempts to produce usable rifles and carbines
for military use. How can you tell them apart? In fact, why wasn’t such
a breechloading system adopted universally, in contrast to a musket with
which a soldier had to stand up and load in the face of enemy fire? Dutcher
tells you why. And then there’s the story of the Marlin Ballard as the
action of choice for schuetzen shooting, and later for the smallbore game.
Be prepared for a good read and a wealth of information.
Rudi Prusok
Editor emeritus,
Single
Shoot Rifle Journal,
American Single
Shot Rifle Association
|